Quality Education for Minorities (QEM) Network
Regional Teacher Professional
Continuum Information and Technical Assistance Workshop
Marriott Metro Center ¥ Washington,
DC
Friday, December 2, 2005
Agenda
8:00 Registration
and Continental
Breakfast Salon
A/B Foyer
8:30 Opening Session Salon A
Welcome,
Introductions, and Review of Purpose and Agenda
Shirley
McBay, President, QEM Network
Welcoming
Remarks
Julia Clark, Program Director,
Teacher Professional Continuum (TPC)
Division
of Elementary, Secondary, and Informal Education (ESIE)
National
Science Foundation (NSF)
8:45 -
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF)
- Overview of the ESIE Division and the TPC Program
Emmett Wright, Section Head, TPC,
NSF
9:15 -
The Mechanics of Proposal Submission
-
NSF Merit Review Criteria and the NSF Review Process
Patricia Freitag, QEM Consultant
and Former TPC Program Officer
9:45 -
Review of Principles of Inquiry[1]
and Key Proposal Components[2]
Michael Piburn, Program Director,
ESIE/TPC, NSF
10:15 Coffee
Break
10:30 Strengths and Weaknesses in Funded
and Un-funded TPC Proposals
Julia Clark, Program
Director, ESIE/TPC, NSF
Monica Mitchell,
QEM Consultant, and Former TPC Program Officer
Frequently
Asked Program-related Questions about Fastlane
Sarita
Shephard, Program Specialist, ESIE, NSF
11:15 Two
Concurrent Sessions on Key Proposal Components
led by TPC Staff and QEM Consultants
Topics: Rationale &
Related Research, Goals, & Projected Outcomes
Session I: Tokyo
Discussion/Implications of Topics
for Proposed Category A Projects
Terry
Woodin, Program Director, Division of Undergraduate
Education (DUE), and TPC, NSF
Angelicque
Tucker Blackmon, Program Director, ESIE/TPC, NSF
Monica
Mitchell, QEM Consultant
Session
II: London
1
Discussion/Implications of Topics for Proposed Category
B Projects
Robert
Sherwood, Program Director, ESIE//TPC, NSF
Patricia
Freitag, QEM Consultant
12:30 Lunch
Salon A
Note: A Special
Session on the Submission of Proposals via NSFÕs FastLane
will be conducted
from 1:30 – 4:00 pm. One member of each institutional team
should attend the FastLane session while the other continues
to participate
in the appropriate
concurrent session on project summaries.
1:30 Proposal
Submission and FastLane Salon A
Evelyn
Baisey-Thomas, Computer Specialist
Division
of Information Systems
Office
of Information and Resource Management, NSF
1:30 Two
Concurrent Sessions (Continuation of Earlier Concurrent Sessions)
Topics:
Work Plan and Personnel
Session I: Tokyo
Discussion of Topics in
Proposed Category A Projects
Jeanne
Small, Program Director, DUE/TPC, NSF
Monica
Mitchell, QEM Consultant
Session
II: London
1
Discussion of Topics in
Proposed Category B Projects
Julia
Clark, ESIE/TPC, NSF
Patricia
Freitag, QEM Consultant
2:45 Coffee
Break
3:00 Two
Concurrent Sessions (Continuation of Earlier Concurrent Sessions)
Topics:
Evaluation and Dissemination
Session I: Tokyo
Discussion
of Topics in Proposed Category A Projects
Terry
Woodin, DUE/TPC, NSF
Jeanne
Small, DUE/TPC NSF
Session II: London
1
Discussion
of Topics in Proposed Category B Projects
Angelicque
Tucker Blackmon, ESIE/TPC, NSF
Patricia
Freitag, QEM Consultant
4:00 Plenary
Session: TPC Budget Preparation
Salon A
Monica Mitchell, QEM
Consultant
Ilonka
Karasz, Grant and Agreement Specialist
Division
of Grants and Agreements (DGA)
Office
of Budget, Finance and Award Management (BFA)
4:45 Closing
Comments
NSF
Staff, QEM Consultants, and QEM Staff
5:00 Adjournment
[1] Principles of Inquiry*
- Pose
significant questions that can be investigated
- Link
research to relevant theory
- Use
methods that permit study of the question
- Provide a
coherent and explicit chain of reasoning
- Explain
how data will be analyzed
- Discuss
dissemination
* National
Research Council (2001) Scientific Inquiry in Education
National Academy Press
(www.nap.edu)
[2] Key Proposal Components:
Project Summary,
Goals, Rationale and Related Literature, Research Questions and/or Hypotheses,
Research Design (Objectives; Strategies for Achieving Objectives; Performance
Indicators; and Evaluation Plan), Work Plan (Major Milestones; Timeline;
Persons responsible for each major phase), Dissemination Plan
Key Personnel and Project Management, and Role of Internal Review Board