Quality Education for Minorities (QEM) Network
Proposal Development Workshop to Broaden the Participation of STEM Faculty at
Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) in the
National Science Foundation (NSF)’s Education and Human Resources (EHR) Directorate
Core Research (ECR) Program

Hilton Baltimore BWI Airport · 1739 West Nursery Road, Linthicum Heights, MD

 Friday-Saturday, April 21-22, 2017

E-RESOURCE LIST
 

NSF Award Guides and Program Information

EHR Core Research (NSF 15-509)
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15509/nsf15509.pdf

Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program (NSF 16-538)
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2016/nsf16538/nsf16538.pdf

Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide Part I (NSF 17-1)
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg17_1/nsf17_1.pdf

Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide Part II (NSF 17-1)
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg17_1/pappg_6.jsp

Prospective New Awardee Guide
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pnag/pnag171.pdf

A Guide for Proposal Writing NSF 04-016
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04016/nsf04016.pdf

Proposal Forms Kit (NSF 00-3)
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/nsf003/kit/intro.htm

National Science Foundation. 2013. Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development. A report from the Institute
             of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education and the National Science Foundation (NSF 13-126)
              http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13126/nsf13126.pdf

     Checklist for the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development
      http://www.evalu-ate.org/resources/cg_checklist/

 

Proposal Development

Berger, Beverly. 2011. “Preparing for Proposal Writing.” Presented at a Career Development
        Workshop organized by the Caltech Postdoctoral Association, April 29, at the California Institute of Technology.
         http://www.cpa.caltech.edu/documents/34-berger_2011_nsf_proposal_writing.pdf.

Hackett, Edward. n.d. “NSF Merit Review Profess and Research Proposal Preparation.”
          Presented at NSF Day at the University of Texas at El Paso. http://nsf.utep.edu/sources/NSFpresentation.pdf.

Hazelrigg, George. 2010. “Competitive Proposal Writing.” Presented September 1, in
          Lincoln, Nebraska. https://epscor.nebraska.edu/media/NSF_George%20Hazelrigg.pdf.

Hazelrigg, George. 2009. “Twelve Steps to a Winning Research Proposal.” Presented at the 2009
          NSF CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop, March 12-13, at George Mason University in Arlington, VA.
          http://www.k-state.edu/career/2009/Twelve_steps.pdf.

National Science Foundation. n.d. “Data Management and Sharing Frequently Asked
           Questions.” http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmpfaqs.jsp.

National Science Foundation. n.d. Merit Review Frequently Asked Questions. Arlington, VA:
           National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/mrfaqs.jsp.

National Science Foundation. n.d. Proposal and Award Process. Arlington, VA: National
            Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/illustration.pdf.

National Science Foundation. n.d. Revised NSF Merit Review Criteria: Effective for Proposals
            Submitted or Due on or After January 14, 2013
. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
             http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/overview.pdf.

National Science Foundation Directorate for Engineering. n.d. National Science Foundation
             Directorate for Engineering. n.d. Sample Budget and Justification. Small Business Innovation Research section of the
             National Science Foundation website. http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/sbir/budget_prep.jsp.

National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate Education. 2004. A Guide for Proposal
             Writing
(NSF 04-016). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04016/nsf04016.pdf.

Teacher Preparation

Allen, Michael.  Eight Questions on Teacher Preparation: What Does the Research
          Say
. Denver, Colorado: Education Commission of the States.
          http://www.ecs.org/html/educationissues/teachingquality/tpreport/home/summary.pdf.

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Serving Learners. 2009.
          Innovation and Reform in Teacher Preparation. Report from the AACTE’s 5th Annual Day on the Hill, June 17-18.
              http://aacte.org/Downloads/Innovation%20and%20Reform%20in%20Teacher%20Preparation.pdf.

Boyd, Donald, Pamela Grossman, Hamilton Lankford, Susanna Loeb, James Wyckoff, 
         Morva McDonald, and Karen Hammerness. n.d. Examining Teacher Preparation: Does the Pathway Make a Difference?
         Teacher Policy Research website. http://irepp.stanford.edu/documents/Examining_Teacher_Preparation_Full_Description.pdf.

Boyd, Donald, Pamela Grossman, Hamilton Lankford, Susanna Loeb, and James Wyckoff. 2008.
         Teacher Preparation and Student Achievement. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
          http://cset.stanford.edu/publications/journal-articles?page=1.

Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States. 2010. Preparing
        Teachers: Building Evidence for Sound Policy. Executive Summary
. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
         http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12882.

Community for Advancing Discovery Research in Education. n.d. STEM Smart Brief: Preparing
         and Supporting STEM Educators
. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
         http://successfulstemeducation.org/sites/successfulstemeducation.org/files/Preparing%20Supporting%20STEM%20Educators_FINAL.pdf.

Dean, Ceri and Patricia Lauer. Systematic Evaluation for Continuous Improvement of
        Teacher Preparation. Volume 1: Cross-case Analysis
. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
         http://www.mcrel.org/PDF/TeacherPrepRetention/5041RR_SystematicEvalTchrPrep-CrossCaseAnalysis.pdf.

Frank, Jennifer and Nancy Shapiro. 2010. The Leadership Collaborative Retreat
        Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities.
         http://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=2923.

Goldhaber, Dan and Stephanie Liddle. 2012. The Gateway to the Profession: Assessing Teacher
        Preparation Programs Based on Student Achievement
. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of
        Longitudinal Data in Education Research and the American Institutes for Research.
        http://www.caldercenter.org/upload/Goldhaber-et-al.pdf.

Greenberg, Julie and Kate Walsh. 2012. What Teacher Preparation Programs Teach About K-12
       Assessment: A Review
. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
       http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/assessment_report.pdf.

Harris, Douglas and Tim Sass. 2007. Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Student
       Achievement
. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in
       Education Research and the American Institutes for Research.  
         http://heartland.org/sites/default/files/1001059_teacher_training.pdf.

Ingersoll, Richard, Ding Gang, Sun Meilu, Kwok Chan Lai, Hidenori Fujita, Ee-gyeong Kim,
       Steven Tan, Angela Wong, Pruet Siribanpitak, and Siriporn Boonyananta. 2007.
       A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations.
       Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
       http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/sixnations_final.pdf.

Kennedy. Mary.  “The Role of Preservice Teacher Education.” In Teaching as the Learning
     Profession: Handbook of Teaching and Policy
, L. Darling-Hammond, and G. Sykes (eds.), 54-86.
      https://www.msu.edu/~mkennedy/publications/docs/Teacher%20Ed/RoleofTE-LDH/Kennedy99%20Role%20of%20TE.pdf.

Levine, Arthur. 2006. Educating School Teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Schools           
       Project. http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Educating_Teachers_Report.pdf.

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. n.d. What Makes a Teacher Effective?:
        A Summary of Key Research Findings on Teacher Preparation
. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher
        Education. http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=JFRrmWqa1jU=.

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education Blue Ribbon Panel on Clinical
         Preparation and Partnerships for Improved Student Learning. 2010. Transforming Teacher Education Through Clinical Practice:
         A National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers
. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
         http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=zzeiB1OoqPk%3D&tabid=715.

Office of Educational Access and Success, the Center for 21st Century Universities, and the
         Center for Advanced Communications Policy. 2012. A Review of State-level Programs to Enhance Postsecondary STEM
         Education in the United States
. Atlanta, GA: Office of Educational Access and Success.
         http://www.usg.edu/educational_access/documents/OEAS_12-02_State-Level_Programs_for_STEM_Education.pdf.

Poliakoff, Ann, Caitlin Dailey, and Robin White. 2011. Pursuing Excellence in Teacher
          Preparation: Evidence of Institutional Change from Teachers for a New Era Learning Network Universities
. Washington, DC:
          Academy for Educational Development.
          http://www.aed.org/Publications/upload/Pursuing-Excellence-in-Teacher-Preparation.pdf.

Psillos, Dimitris and Rosa Maria Sperando (eds.). 2012. “Part 12: Pre-service Science Teacher
          Education.” In E-book Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference: Science Learning and Citizenship, C. Bruguiére,
          Andrée Tiberghien, and Pierre Clément (eds.).  European Science Education Research Association.
          http://www.esera.org/media/ebook/ebook-esera2011____Strand12.pdf.

Rosas, Clarissa and Mary West. 2011. Pre-service Teachers’ Perception and Beliefs of Readiness
         to Teach Mathematics. Current Issues in Education, 14(1).
         http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/64371143/pre-service-teachers-perception-beliefs-readiness-teach-mathematics.

Stewart, Vivien. 2011. International Summit on the Teaching Profession. The Asia Society and
         the U.S. Department of Education. http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/22820.

Tatto, Maria, John Schwille, Sharon Senk, Lawrence Ingvarson, Glenn Rowley, Ray Peck, Kiril Bankov, Michael Rodriguez,
          and Mark Reckase. 2012. Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries:
          Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics
. Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
          International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. 
          http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/TEDS-M_International_Report.pdf.

Wilson, Suzanne. Robert Floden, and Joan Ferrini-Mundy. 2001. Teacher Preparation Research:
         Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations
. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
             depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.

STEM Education

Carnevale, Anthony, Nicole Smith, and Michelle Melton. 2011. Science, Technology,
          Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
           http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/stem-complete.pdf.

Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education and Board
         on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. 2011.
         Successful K-12 STEM Education: IdentifyingEffective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
         Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
         www.stemreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/NRC_STEM_2.pdf.

Dancy, Melissa and Charles Henderson. 2008. “Barriers and Promises in STEM Reform.”
         Presented at the National Academies of Science Workshop on Linking Evidence and
         Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education, October 13-14, in
         Washington, DC. http://visionandchange.org/files/2010/03/Barriers_and_Promise_in_STEM_Reform.pdf.

Fairweather, James. n.d. Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Science, Technology,  Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
         Undergraduate Education: A Status Report for the National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education.

         Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
             http://create4stem.msu.edu/sites/default/files/event/files/Fairweather_WhitePaperNAS_11-08.doc.pdf.

Hansen, Michael. 2013. Characteristics of Schools Successful in STEM: Evidence from Two
         States’ Longitudinal Data
. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research and
         the American Institutes for Research.
         http://www.caldercenter.org/publications/upload/WP-97_final.pdf.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2010. Prepare and Inspire: K-12
          Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for America’s
          Future
. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States.
              http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf.

Broadening Participation

Aud, Susan, Mary Ann Fox, and Angelina KewalRamani. 2010. Status and Trends in the
        Education of Racial and Ethnic Minorities
. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education’s
        National Center for Education Statistics.
           http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010015/

Bass, Scott, Janet Rutledge, Elizabeth Douglass, and Wendy Carter. 2007. The University
        as Mentor: Lessons Learned from UMBC Inclusiveness Initiatives.
Washington, DC: University of Maryland Baltimore
        County and the Council of Graduate Schools. http://www.cgsnet.org/cgs-occasional-paper-series/university-maryland-baltimore-county

Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering
       Workforce Pipeline. 2011. Executive Summary: Expanding Underrepresented Minority
       Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
       http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12984.

Cullinane, Jenna, and Lacey Leegwater. 2009. Diversifying the STEM Pipeline: The Model
       Replication Institutions Program
. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
       http://www.ihep.org/Publications/publications-detail.cfm?id=132

Alternative Teaching

A. Trends in Teaching
Barseghian, Tina. 2011. “Three Trends that Define the Future of Teaching and Learning.” The
         KQED, Inc. website. http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2011/02/three-trends-that-define-the-future-of-teaching-and-learning/.

Lambert, Craig. March/April 2012. Twilight of the Lecture. Harvard Magazine, 23-27.
          http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture.

B. Active and Problem-based Learning
Armbruster, Peter, Maya Patel, and Erika Johnson. 2009. Active Learning and Student-
          centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology.
         CBE Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 203-213. 
         http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736024/?tool=pubmed.

Lom, Barbara. 2012. Classroom Activities: Simple Strategies to Incorporate Student-centered
        Activities within Undergraduate Science Lectures. The Journal of Undergraduate
        Neuroscience Education
, 11(1), A64-A71.
           http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23494568.

C. Flipped/Inverted Classrooms

Educause. 2012. Seven (7) Things You Should Know About Flipped Classrooms
        Washington, DC: Educause. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli7081.pdf

Marcey, David and Michael Brint. n.d. Transforming an Undergraduate Introductory Biology
        Course through Cinematic Lectures and Inverted Classes (CLIC): A Preliminary Assessment of the CLIC Model of the Flipped Classroom
.
         The National Association of Biology Teachers website.
         https://www.nabt.org/websites/institution/File/docs/Four%20Year%20Section/2012%20Proceedings/Marcey%20&%20Brint.pdf

Assessment and Education Research

Della-Piana, C. K. Assessment and education research in undergraduate  
            science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. In                                       
            Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology,
            engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 17-18). Washington, DC:                            
            American Association for the Advancement of Science.
            http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/della-piana.pdf

Heron, P. R., Shaffer, L. P. S., and McDermott, L. Research as a guide to improving student learning:
           An example from Introductory Physics. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate
           science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 33-38). Washington, DC:                               
           American Association for the Advancement of Science.
           http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/heron_et_al.pdf

Maki, W. S. Evaluating outcomes. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology,
           engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 27-32). Washington, DC: American Association for the
           Advancement of Science.
           http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/maki.pdf

Richardson, J. Concept Inventories: Tools for Uncovering STEM Students’ Misconceptions. In Invention and impact:
           Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 19-25).                       
           Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.         
           http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/richardson.pdf

Evaluation

Coalition for Evidence-based Policy.  2005. Reporting the results of your study:  A user-friendly
           guide for evaluators of educational programs and practices
. Rockville, MD: What Works Clearinghouse.
               http://coalition4evidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/IES_Guide_to_Reporting_Study_Results.pdf

Ely, D. and Michael Huberman.  User-friendly handbook for project dissemination:
         Science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education
. Washington, DC:
         National Science Foundation.
             http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED370810.pdf           

Frechtling, J. et al. 2010. The 2010 user-friendly handbook for project evaluation. Arlington, VA:
         National Science Foundation.
         http://www.evalu-ate.org/wp-content/uploads/formidable/Doc_2010_NSFHandbook.pdf

Gajda, R. and Jennifer Jewiss. Thinking about how to evaluate your program? These strategies
         will get you started. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(8).
         http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=8.

Sharp, L. 1997. Evaluation design for the hypothetical project. In Joy Frechtling and Laure Sharp
          (Eds.), User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
          http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/chap_6.htm.

Sharp, L. and Joy Frechtling.  Overview of the design process for mixed-method
          evaluation. In Joy Frechtling and Laure Sharp (Eds.), User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA:
          National Science Foundation.
          http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/chap_5.htm.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. 2004. W.K. Kellogg evaluation handbook. Battle Creek, MI:
          W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
           http://cyc.brandeis.edu/pdfs/reports/EvaluationHandbook.pdf

Evaluation Tools

AAAS Measuring Diversity: An Evaluation Guide for STEM Graduate School Leaders
           http://www.nsfagep.org/files/2011/04/MeasuringDiversity-EvalGuide.pdf

The 2010 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation
            https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf02057.pdf

Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects
            http://informalscience.org/documents/Eval_Framework.pdf

User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations
            http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/start.htm

Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Broadening Participation Projects
          http://www.nsf.gov/od/broadeningparticipation/framework-evaluating-impacts-broadening-participation-projects_1101.pdf

AGEP Evaluation Tools
             http://www.nsfagep.org/evaluation-resources/

Successful Pedagogies

Beichner, R. J., and Saul, J. M. Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for
            Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) project. In Invention and impact: Building
            excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)   
            education
, (pp. 61-66). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
            http://www.ncsu.edu/per/Articles/Varenna_SCALEUP_Paper.pdf

Ellis, G. W., and Andam, B. B. Designing the engineering classroom for women.                         
           In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)
           education
, (pp. 79-84). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
           http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/ellis_andam.pdf

Kaplan, D.  Some mathematics for citizens: Gaining quantitative literacy through public policy
           debate. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and
           mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 73-77). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.      
           www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/kaplan.pdf

Patterson, E. T.  Just-in-time teaching: Technology transforming learning: A status report.                     
            In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)
            education
, (pp. 49-54).  Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
            http://itari.in/categories/justintimelearning/Just-In-TimeTeaching-Research.pdf

Ulseth, R. From nothing to something. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology,
          engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp.   85-87). Washington, DC: American Association for the
          Advancement of Science.
          http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/ulseth.pdf

Varma-Nelson, P., Cracolice, M. S., and Gosser, D. K. Peer-led team learning: A student-faculty partnership for transforming
          the learning environment. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology,      
          engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 43-48). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement
          of Science.
             http://cpltl.iupui.edu/media/178fcbfc-adad-4da7-b19a-1b61c32b8d01/-1748818361/cPLTLContent/2013/PLTL%20Literature%20PDFs/Varma-Nelson%20et%20al_2004.pdf

Waterman, M. A., and Stanley, E. D.  Investigative case-based learning; Teaching scientifically while connecting science to society.
          In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education,
          (pp. 55-60). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
           http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/waterman_stanley.pdf