Quality Education for Minorities (QEM) Network
Workshop to Broaden Participation and Increase the Competitiveness of
Minority-serving Institutions (MSIs) in the NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
Hilton Baltimore BWI Airport
· 1739 West Nursery Road, Linthicum Heights, MD
Friday-Saturday, June 9-10, 2017 

E-RESOURCE LIST

NSF Award Guides and Program Information

Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Solicitation (NSF 17-541))
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17541/nsf17541.pdf

Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide Part I (NSF 17-1)
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg17_1/nsf17_1.pdf

Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide Part II (NSF 17-1)
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg17_1/pappg_6.jsp

Prospective New Awardee Guide
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pnag/pnag171.pdf

A Guide for Proposal Writing NSF 04-016
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04016/nsf04016.pdf

Proposal Forms Kit (NSF 00-3)
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/nsf003/kit/intro.htm

National Science Foundation. 2013. Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development.
     A report from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education and the
     National Science Foundation (NSF 13-126)
     http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13126/nsf13126.pdf

       Checklist for the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development
     http://www.evalu-ate.org/resources/cg_checklist/

Proposal Development

Berger, Beverly. 2011. “Preparing for Proposal Writing.” Presented at a Career Development
     Workshop organized by the Caltech Postdoctoral Association, April 29, at the California
     Institute of Technology. http://www.cpa.caltech.edu/documents/34-berger_2011_nsf_proposal_writing.pdf.

Hackett, Edward. n.d. “NSF Merit Review Profess and Research Proposal Preparation.”
     Presented at NSF Day at the University of Texas at El Paso. http://nsf.utep.edu/sources/NSFpresentation.pdf.

Hazelrigg, George. 2010. “Competitive Proposal Writing.” Presented September 1, in
     Lincoln, Nebraska. https://epscor.nebraska.edu/media/NSF_George%20Hazelrigg.pdf.

Hazelrigg, George. 2009. “Twelve Steps to a Winning Research Proposal.” Presented at the 2009
     NSF CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop, March 12-13, at George Mason University
     in Arlington, VA. http://www.k-state.edu/career/2009/Twelve_steps.pdf.

National Science Foundation. n.d. “Data Management and Sharing Frequently Asked
     Questions.” http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmpfaqs.jsp.

National Science Foundation. n.d. Merit Review Frequently Asked Questions. Arlington, VA:
     National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/mrfaqs.jsp.

National Science Foundation. n.d. Proposal and Award Process. Arlington, VA:
     National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/illustration.pdf.

National Science Foundation. n.d. Revised NSF Merit Review Criteria: Effective for Proposals
     Submitted or Due on or After January 14, 2013. Arlington, VA:
     National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/overview.pdf.

National Science Foundation Directorate for Engineering. n.d. National Science Foundation
     Directorate for Engineering. n.d. Sample Budget and Justification. Small Business Innovation
     Research section of the National Science Foundation website. http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/sbir/budget_prep.jsp.

National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate Education. 2004. A Guide for Proposal
     Writing (NSF 04-016). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04016/nsf04016.pdf.

Teacher Preparation

Allen, Michael.  Eight Questions on Teacher Preparation: What Does the Research Say. Denver,
     Colorado: Education Commission of the States.
     http://www.ecs.org/html/educationissues/teachingquality/tpreport/home/summary.pdf.

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Serving Learners. 2009.
     Innovation and Reform in Teacher Preparation. Report from the AACTE’s 5th Annual Day on the Hill, June 17-18.
     http://aacte.org/Downloads/Innovation%20and%20Reform%20in%20Teacher%20Preparation.pdf.

Boyd, Donald, Pamela Grossman, Hamilton Lankford, Susanna Loeb, James Wyckoff,
     Morva McDonald, and Karen Hammerness. n.d. Examining Teacher Preparation: Does the Pathway Make a Difference?
     Teacher Policy Research website. http://irepp.stanford.edu/documents/Examining_Teacher_Preparation_Full_Description.pdf.

Boyd, Donald, Pamela Grossman, Hamilton Lankford, Susanna Loeb, and James Wyckoff. 2008.
     Teacher Preparation and Student Achievement. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
      http://cset.stanford.edu/publications/journal-articles?page=1.

Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States. 2010. Preparing
    Teachers: Building Evidence for Sound Policy. Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
    http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12882.

Community for Advancing Discovery Research in Education. n.d. STEM Smart Brief:
     Preparing and Supporting STEM Educators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
     http://successfulstemeducation.org/sites/successfulstemeducation.org/files/Preparing%20Supporting%20STEM%20Educators_FINAL.pdf.

Dean, Ceri and Patricia Lauer. Systematic Evaluation for Continuous Improvement of
     Teacher Preparation. Volume 1: Cross-case Analysis. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.  
     http://www.mcrel.org/PDF/TeacherPrepRetention/5041RR_SystematicEvalTchrPrep-CrossCaseAnalysis.pdf.

Frank, Jennifer and Nancy Shapiro. 2010. The Leadership Collaborative Retreat.     
    Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. http://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=2923.

Goldhaber, Dan and Stephanie Liddle. 2012. The Gateway to the Profession: Assessing Teacher
     Preparation Programs Based on Student Achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of
     Longitudinal Data in Education Research and the American Institutes for Research.
     http://www.caldercenter.org/upload/Goldhaber-et-al.pdf.

Greenberg, Julie and Kate Walsh. 2012. What Teacher Preparation Programs Teach About K-12
    Assessment: A Review. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
    http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/assessment_report.pdf.

Harris, Douglas and Tim Sass. 2007. Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement.
     Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research
     and the American Institutes for Research.  
     http://heartland.org/sites/default/files/1001059_teacher_training.pdf.

Ingersoll, Richard, Ding Gang, Sun Meilu, Kwok Chan Lai, Hidenori Fujita, Ee-gyeong Kim, Steven Tan,
     Angela Wong, Pruet Siribanpitak, and Siriporn Boonyananta. 2007. A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation
     and Qualifications in Six Nations. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
     http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/sixnations_final.pdf.

Kennedy. Mary.  “The Role of Preservice Teacher Education.” In Teaching as the Learning
     Profession: Handbook of Teaching and Policy, L. Darling-Hammond, and G. Sykes (eds.), 54-86.
     https://www.msu.edu/~mkennedy/publications/docs/Teacher%20Ed/RoleofTE-LDH/Kennedy99%20Role%20of%20TE.pdf.

Levine, Arthur. 2006. Educating School Teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Schools
     Project. http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Educating_Teachers_Report.pdf.

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. n.d. What Makes a Teacher Effective?:
     A Summary of Key Research Findings on Teacher Preparation. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of
    Teacher Education. http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=JFRrmWqa1jU=.

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education Blue Ribbon Panel on Clinical
     Preparation and Partnerships for Improved Student Learning. 2010. Transforming Teacher Education
     Through Clinical Practice: A National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers. Washington, DC: National Council
     for Accreditation of Teacher Education. http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=zzeiB1OoqPk%3D&tabid=715.

Office of Educational Access and Success, the Center for 21st Century Universities, and the Center for Advanced
     Communications Policy. 2012. A Review of State-level Programs to Enhance Postsecondary STEM Education in the
     United States. Atlanta, GA: Office of Educational Access and Success.
     http://www.usg.edu/educational_access/documents/OEAS_12-02_State-Level_Programs_for_STEM_Education.pdf.

Poliakoff, Ann, Caitlin Dailey, and Robin White. 2011. Pursuing Excellence in Teacher Preparation:
     Evidence of Institutional Change from Teachers for a New Era Learning Network Universities. Washington, DC:
     Academy for Educational Development. http://www.aed.org/Publications/upload/Pursuing-Excellence-in-Teacher-Preparation.pdf.

Psillos, Dimitris and Rosa Maria Sperando (eds.). 2012. “Part 12: Pre-service Science Teacher
     Education.” In E-book Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference: Science Learning and Citizenship, C. Bruguiére,
     Andrée Tiberghien, and Pierre Clément (eds.).  European Science Education Research Association.
     http://www.esera.org/media/ebook/ebook-esera2011____Strand12.pdf.

Rosas, Clarissa and Mary West. 2011. Pre-service Teachers’ Perception and Beliefs of Readiness
     to Teach Mathematics. Current Issues in Education, 14(1).
     http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/64371143/pre-service-teachers-perception-beliefs-readiness-teach-mathematics.

Stewart, Vivien. 2011. International Summit on the Teaching Profession. The Asia Society and
     the U.S. Department of Education. http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/22820.

Tatto, Maria, John Schwille, Sharon Senk, Lawrence Ingvarson, Glenn Rowley, Ray Peck, Kiril
     Bankov, Michael Rodriguez, and Mark Reckase. 2012. Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and
     Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics.
     Amsterdam, the Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. 
     http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/TEDS-M_International_Report.pdf.

Wilson, Suzanne. Robert Floden, and Joan Ferrini-Mundy. 2001. Teacher Preparation Research:
     Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.  
     depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.

STEM Education

Carnevale, Anthony, Nicole Smith, and Michelle Melton. 2011. Science, Technology,
     Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
     http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/stem-complete.pdf.

Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education and Board on Science Education and
     Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. 2011. Successful K-12 STEM
     Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.Washington, DC:
     The National Academies Press. www.stemreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/NRC_STEM_2.pdf.

Dancy, Melissa and Charles Henderson. 2008. “Barriers and Promises in STEM Reform.”
     Presented at the National Academies of Science Workshop on Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in
     STEM Undergraduate Education, October 13-14, in Washington, DC.
     http://visionandchange.org/files/2010/03/Barriers_and_Promise_in_STEM_Reform.pdf.

Fairweather, James. n.d. Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Science, Technology, 
     Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Undergraduate Education: A Status Report for the National Academies
     National Research Council Board of Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
     http://create4stem.msu.edu/sites/default/files/event/files/Fairweather_WhitePaperNAS_11-08.doc.pdf.

Hansen, Michael. 2013. Characteristics of Schools Successful in STEM: Evidence from Two States’ Longitudinal Data.
     Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research and the American Institutes
     for Research. http://www.caldercenter.org/publications/upload/WP-97_final.pdf.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2010. Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science,
     Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for America’s Future. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the
     President of the United States.
     http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf.

Broadening Participation

Aud, Susan, Mary Ann Fox, and Angelina KewalRamani. 2010. Status and Trends in the
     Education of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for
     Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010015/

Bass, Scott, Janet Rutledge, Elizabeth Douglass, and Wendy Carter. 2007. The University
     as Mentor: Lessons Learned from UMBC Inclusiveness Initiatives. Washington, DC: University of Maryland Baltimore
     County and the Council of Graduate Schools.
     http://www.cgsnet.org/cgs-occasional-paper-series/university-maryland-baltimore-county

Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering
     Workforce Pipeline. 2011. Executive Summary: Expanding Underrepresented Minority   Participation: America’s
      Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
      http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12984.

Cullinane, Jenna, and Lacey Leegwater. 2009. Diversifying the STEM Pipeline: The Model
     Replication Institutions Program. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
     http://www.ihep.org/Publications/publications-detail.cfm?id=132

Alternative Teaching

 A. Trends in Teaching
Barseghian, Tina. 2011. “Three Trends that Define the Future of Teaching and Learning.” The
     KQED, Inc. website. http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2011/02/three-trends-that-define-the-future-of-teaching-and-learning/.

Lambert, Craig. March/April 2012. Twilight of the Lecture. Harvard Magazine, 23-27.
     http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture.

B. Active and Problem-based Learning
Armbruster, Peter, Maya Patel, and Erika Johnson. 2009. Active Learning and Student-
     centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology. CBE Life Sciences
     Education, 8(3), 203-213.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736024/?tool=pubmed.

Lom, Barbara. 2012. Classroom Activities: Simple Strategies to Incorporate Student-centered
     Activities within Undergraduate Science Lectures. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 11(1), A64-A71.
     http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23494568.

C. Flipped/Inverted Classrooms

Educause. 2012. Seven (7) Things You Should Know About Flipped Classrooms.     
     Washington, DC: Educause. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli7081.pdf

Marcey, David and Michael Brint. n.d. Transforming an Undergraduate Introductory Biology
     Course through Cinematic Lectures and Inverted Classes (CLIC): A Preliminary Assessment of the CLIC Model of the Flipped
     Classroom. The National Association of Biology Teachers website.
     https://www.nabt.org/websites/institution/File/docs/Four%20Year%20Section/2012%20Proceedings/Marcey%20&%20Brint.pdf

Assessment and Education Research

Della-Piana, C. K. Assessment and education research in undergraduate science, technology, engineering,
     and mathematics (STEM) education. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology,                          
     engineering and mathematics (STEM) education,
(pp. 17-18). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
     http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/della-piana.pdf

Heron, P. R., Shaffer, L. P. S., and McDermott, L. Research as a guide to improving student learning: An example from
      Introductory Physics. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and
      mathematics (STEM) education,
(pp. 33-38). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
      http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/heron_et_al.pdf

Maki, W. S. Evaluating outcomes. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering
      and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 27-32). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
     http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/maki.pdf

Richardson, J. Concept Inventories: Tools for Uncovering STEM Students’ Misconceptions. In Invention and impact:
      Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education,
(pp. 19-25). 
     Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
      http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_res_eval/richardson.pdf

Evaluation

Coalition for Evidence-based Policy.  2005. Reporting the results of your study:  A user-friendly
     guide for evaluators of educational programs and practices. Rockville, MD: What Works Clearinghouse.
    http://coalition4evidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/IES_Guide_to_Reporting_Study_Results.pdf

Ely, D. and Michael Huberman.  User-friendly handbook for project dissemination:
     Science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
     http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED370810.pdf           

Frechtling, J. et al. 2010. The 2010 user-friendly handbook for project evaluation. Arlington, VA:
     National Science Foundation.
     http://www.evalu-ate.org/wp-content/uploads/formidable/Doc_2010_NSFHandbook.pdf

Gajda, R. and Jennifer Jewiss. Thinking about how to evaluate your program? These strategies
     will get you started. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(8).
     http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=8.

Sharp, L. 1997. Evaluation design for the hypothetical project. In Joy Frechtling and Laure Sharp
     (Eds.), User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
     http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/chap_6.htm.

Sharp, L. and Joy Frechtling.  Overview of the design process for mixed-method
     evaluation. In Joy Frechtling and Laure Sharp (Eds.), User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA:
     National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/chap_5.htm.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. 2004. W.K. Kellogg evaluation handbook. Battle Creek, MI:
     W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
     http://cyc.brandeis.edu/pdfs/reports/EvaluationHandbook.pdf

Evaluation Tools

AAAS Measuring Diversity: An Evaluation Guide for STEM Graduate School Leaders
     http://www.nsfagep.org/files/2011/04/MeasuringDiversity-EvalGuide.pdf

The 2010 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation
    https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf02057.pdf

Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects
     http://informalscience.org/documents/Eval_Framework.pdf

User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations
     http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/start.htm

Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Broadening Participation Projects
     http://www.nsf.gov/od/broadeningparticipation/framework-evaluating-impacts-broadening-participation-projects_1101.pdf

AGEP Evaluation Tools
     http://www.nsfagep.org/evaluation-resources/

Successful Pedagogies

Beichner, R. J., and Saul, J. M. Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for
     Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) project. In Invention and impact: Building
     excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, (pp. 61-66).
     Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
      http://www.ncsu.edu/per/Articles/Varenna_SCALEUP_Paper.pdf

Ellis, G. W., and Andam, B. B. Designing the engineering classroom for women. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in
     undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, (pp. 79-84). Washington, DC:  
     American Association for the Advancement of Science.
     http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/ellis_andam.pdf

Kaplan, D.  Some mathematics for citizens: Gaining quantitative literacy through public policy
     debate. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics
     (STEM) education, (pp. 73-77). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
     www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/kaplan.pdf

Patterson, E. T.  Just-in-time teaching: Technology transforming learning: A status report. In Invention and impact:
     Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, (pp. 49-54).
     Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
      http://itari.in/categories/justintimelearning/Just-In-TimeTeaching-Research.pdf

Ulseth, R. From nothing to something. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology,
     engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, (pp.   85-87). Washington, DC: American Association for the
     Advancement of Science.
     http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/ulseth.pdf

Varma-Nelson, P., Cracolice, M. S., and Gosser, D. K. Peer-led team learning: A student-faculty partnership for transforming
     the learning environment. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology,
     engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, (pp. 43-48). Washington, DC: American Association for the
     Advancement of Science.
     http://cpltl.iupui.edu/media/178fcbfc-adad-4da7-b19a-1b61c32b8d01/-1748818361/cPLTLContent/2013/PLTL%20Literature%20PDFs/Varma-Nelson%20et%20al_2004.pdf

Waterman, M. A., and Stanley, E. D.  Investigative case-based learning; Teaching scientifically while connecting science
      to society. In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics
     (STEM) education, (pp. 55-60). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
     http://www.unc.edu/opt-ed/eval/bp_stem_ed/waterman_stanley.pdf